A v V [2022] EWHC 3501

DR v ES [2022] EWFC 62

Crowther v Crowther & Ors (Financial Remedies) [2021] EWFC 88

Re YP (Adoption of 18 Year Old) [2021] EWHC 3168 (Fam)

Potanina v Potanin [2021] EWCA Civ 702

Rogan v Rogan [2020] EWFC B32 (OJ)

Akhmedova v Akhmedov & Ors (Litigation Funding) (Rev 1) [2020] EWHC 1526 (Fam)

Akhmedova v Akhmedov & Ors [2020] EWHC 2257 (Fam)

Akhmedova v Akhmedov & Ors [2020] EWHC 2235 (Fam)

AF v SF [2019] EWHC 1224 (Fam)

The firm acted for the husband (Respondent) in financial remedy proceedings in which almost all of the assets were held in Trust funds of which the husband was a beneficiary. The husband was represented by the Official Solicitor.

Timokhina v Timokhin [2019] EWCA Civ 1284

The firm acted for the wife (Appellant) in an appeal in relation to an order that she pay £109,394 in respect of the costs of Alexander Timokhin, the father, incurred during the course of litigation concerning the future arrangements for the care of their children. The case involved considerations in relation to costs principles.

Pierburg v Pierburg [2019] EWFC 24

Advised the wife (Petitioner) in a case on whether the wife’s application to divorce the respondent husband should be heard in the family court of England and Wales, as per the wife’s position, or in Germany, as per the husband’s position, following the wife’s move to the UK after the parties separated.