Reported Cases
We make every effort to settle cases but if litigation is necessary we are very expert in it.
Hughes Fowler Carruthers remains a firm of choice for the huge money cases The Legal 500 2020
BD v FD (Maintenance) [2014] EWHC 4443 (Fam)
Advised in an application for maintenance pending suit application where the wife’s interim budget manifestly exceeded the standard of living of the marriage and where court intervention was not required to ensure her interim needs were met.
Mohan v Mohan [2013] EWCA Civ 138
The firm acted for the wife (Appellant) in an appeal seeking to rely on all information and documents provided by the Husband in accordance with the Order within the Wife’s general application proceedings excluded by the Judge in a previous hearing. The Husband did not attend nor was he represented at the appeal. Accordingly, an advocate to the Court was appointed.
Arif v Anwar & Anor [2013] EWCH 624 (Fam)
Acted for the wife (Petitioner) in a financial remedy application which involved a bankrupt husband and an oral disclosure hearing. This case required a consideration of how an issue relevant both to proceedings in the Family Division and in the Chancery Division might be managed in the most sensible manner.
Mohan v Mohan [2013] EWCA Civ 586
The firm acted for the wife (Appellant) in an appeal on the admissibility of documents and statements made within enforcement of financial remedy orders.
Tchenguiz-Imerman v Imerman [2013] EWHC 3627 (Fam)
Advising the husband (Respondent) in a case relating to the issue of disclosure concerning trusts following the conclusion of substantive financial remedy proceedings.
Young v Young [2013] EWHC 34 (Fam)
The firm acted for the husband (Respondent) in a high-profile case in which the wife had applied for the full range of financial remedies and the husband had applied for variation of a maintenance pending suit order.
Evans v Evans [2013] EWHC 506 FAM
Represented the wife (Applicant) in an application for financial remedies in case involving assets of £40m. Issues of financial conduct and special contribution, and the definition of marital property were considered.
A v (1) B (2) C [2012] EWCA Civ 285
The firm represented the mothers (Respondents) in an appeal by biological father of a child residing with the biological mother and her lesbian partner concerning contact arrangements in respect of the child.
Sofia Arif v (1) Arif Anwar Zar (2) Raziz Rehan [2012] EWCA Civ 986
Acted for the wife (Petitioner) in an application for permission to appeal the Judge’s order which, inter alia, transferred an annulment application to the Family Division.
Evans v Evans [2012] EWCA Civ 1293
The firm acted for the mother (Appellant) in an appeal from the making of a decree absolute on the grounds of fresh evidence that the decree would prevent enforcement of order transferring shares.
Tchenguiz-Imerman v Imerman [2012] EWCH 4277 (Fam)
The firm acted for the husband (Respondent) in an application for party status by the husband’s adult children, who were beneficiaries of offshore trusts, which were subject to an application for variation of post-nuptial settlement.
Elena Golubovich v Ilya Golubovich [2011] EWCA Civ 528
Acted for the wife (Applicant) in a application in respect of security for costs in proceedings pending husband’s application for permission to appeal in ancillary relief proceedings, where rules and case law were considered.
